Tutorial: list the content of your favorite forge in just a few steps#
The three major phases of work in Software Heritage’s preservation process, on the technical side, are listing software sources, scheduling updates and loading the software artifacts into the archive.
A previous effort in 2017 consisted in designing the framework to make lister a straightforward “fill in the blanks” process, based on gained experience on the diversity found in the listed services. This is the second iteration on the lister framework design, comprising a library and an API which is easier to work with and less “magic” (read implicit). This new design is part of a larger effort in redesigning the scheduling system for the recurring tasks updating the content of the archive.
Fundamentally, a basic lister must follow these steps:
Issue a network request for a service endpoint.
Convert the response data into a model object.
Send the model object to the scheduler.
Steps 1 and 3 are generic problems, that are often already solved by helpers or in other listers. That leaves us mainly to implement step 2, which is simple when the remote service provides an API.
requesting remote services through HTTP
scrapping if no API is offered
Analysis of the target service. Prepare the following elements to write the lister:
instance names and URLs
requesting scheme: base URL, path, query_string, POST data, headers
authentication types and which one to support, if any
rate-limiting: HTTP codes and headers used
data format: JSON/XML/HTML/…?
mapping between remote data and needed data (ListedOrigin model, internal state)
We will now walk through the steps to build a new lister.
Please use this template to start with:
In order to write a lister, two basic elements are required. These are the
Lister base class and the
ListedOrigin scheduler model class.
Optionally, for listers that need to keep a state and support incremental listing, an
ListerState will come into play.
We extensively type-annotate our listers, as any new code, which makes proeminent that those lister classes are generic, and take the following parameters:
Lister: the lister state type, the page type
StatelessLister: only the page type
You can can start by declaring a stateless lister and leave the implementation of state for later if the listing needs it. We will see how to in Handling lister state.
Both the lister state type and the page type are user-defined types. However, while the page type may only exist as a type annotation, the state type for a stateful lister must be associated with a concrete object. The state type is commonly defined as a dataclass whereas the page type is often a mere annotation, potentially given a nice alias.
Example lister declaration:
NewForgePage = List[Dict[str, Any]] @dataclass class NewForgeListerState: ... class NewForgeLister(Lister[NewForgeListerState, NewForgePage]): LISTER_NAME = "My" ...
The new lister must declare a name through the
LISTER_NAME class attribute.
The lister constructor is only required to ask for a
object to pass to the base class. But it does not mean that it is all that’s needed for
it to useful. A lister need information on which remote service to talk to. It needs an
Some services are centralized and offered by a single organization. Think of Github. Others are offered by many people across the Internet, each using a different hosting, each providing specific data. Think of the many Gitlab instances. We need a name to identify each instance, and even if there is only one, we need its URL to access it concretely.
Now, you may think of any strategy to infer the information or hardcode it, but the base class needs an URL and an instance name. In any case, for a multi-instance service, you better be explicit and require the URL as constructor argument. We recommend the URL to be some form of a base URL, to be concatenated with any variable part appearing either because there exist multiple instances or the URL need recomputation in the listing process.
If we need any credentials to access a remote service, and do so in our polite but persistent fashion (remember that we want fresh information), you are encouraged to provide support for authenticated access. The base class support handling credentials as a set of identifier/secret pair. It knows how to load from a secrets store the right ones for the current (“lister name”, “instance name”) setting, if none were originally provided through the task parameters. You can ask for other types of access tokens in a separate parameter, but then you lose this advantage.
Example of a typical lister constructor:
def __init__( self, scheduler: SchedulerInterface, url: str, instance: str, credentials: CredentialsType = None, ): super().__init__( scheduler=scheduler, url=url, instance=instance, credentials=credentials, ) ...
Core lister functionality#
For the lister to contribute data to the archive, you now have to write the logic to fetch data from the remote service, and format it in the canonical form the scheduler expects, as outined in Fundamentals. To this purpose, the two methods to implement are:
def get_pages(self) -> Iterator[NewForgePage]: ... def get_origins_from_page(self, page: NewForgePage) -> Iterator[ListedOrigin]: ...
Those two core functions are called by the principal lister method,
Lister.run(), found in the base class.
get_pages() is the guts of the lister. It takes no arguments and must produce
data pages. An iterator is fine here, as the
Lister.run() method only mean to
iterate in a single pass on it. This method gets its input from a network request to a
remote service’s endpoint to retrieve the data we long for.
Depending on whether the data is adequately structured for our purpose can be tricky. Here you may have to show off your data scraping skills, or just consume a well-designed API. Those aspects are discussed more specifically in the section Handling specific topics.
In any case, we want the data we return to be usefully filtered and structured. The
easiest way to create an iterator is to use the
yield keyword. Yield each data page
you have structured in accordance with the page type you have declared. The page type
exists only for static type checking of data passed from
get_origins_from_page(); you can choose whatever fits the bill.
get_origins_from_page() is simpler. For each individual software origin you
have received in the page, you convert and yield a
object. This datatype has the following mandatory fields:
lister id: you generally fill this with the value of
visit type: the type of software distribution format the service provides. For use by a corresponding loader. It is an identifier, so you have to either use an existing value or craft a new one if you get off the beaten track and tackle a new software source. But then you will have to discuss the name with the core developers.
Example: Phabricator is a forge that can handle Git or SVN repositories. The visit type would be “git” when listing such a repo that provides a Git URL that we can load.
origin URL: an URL that, combined with the visit type, will serve as the input of loader.
This datatype can also further be detailed with the optional fields:
last update date: freshness information on this origin, which is useful to the scheduler for optimizing its scheduling decisions. Fill it if provided by the service, at no substantial additional runtime cost, e.g. in the same request.
extra loader arguments: extra parameters to be passed to the loader for it to be able to load the origin. It is needed for example when additional context is needed along with the URL to effectively load from the origin.
See the definition of ListedOrigin.
Now that that we showed how those two methods operate, let’s put it together by showing
how they fit in the principal
def run(self) -> ListerStats: full_stats = ListerStats() try: for page in self.get_pages(): full_stats.pages += 1 origins = self.get_origins_from_page(page) full_stats.origins += self.send_origins(origins) self.commit_page(page) finally: self.finalize() if self.updated: self.set_state_in_scheduler() return full_stats
Lister.send_origins() is the method that sends listed origins to the scheduler.
ListerState datastructure, defined along the base lister class, is used
to compute the number of listed pages and origins in a single lister run. It is useful
both for the scheduler that automatically collects this information and to test the
You see that the bulk of a lister run consists in streaming data gathered from the
remote service to the scheduler. And this is done under a
try...finally construct to
have the lister state reliably recorded in case of unhandled error. We will explain the
role of the remaining methods and attributes appearing here in the next section as it is
related to the lister state.
Handling lister state#
With what we have covered until now you can write a stateless lister. Unfortunately, some services provide too much data to efficiently deal with it in a one-shot fashion. Listing a given software source can take several hours or days to process. Our listers can also give valid output, but fail on an unexpected condition and would have to start over. As we want to be able to resume the listing process from a given element, provided by the remote service and guaranteed to be ordered, such as a date or a numeric identifier, we need to deal with state.
The remaining part of the lister API is reserved for dealing with lister state.
If the service to list has no pagination, then the data set to handle is small enough to not require keeping lister state. In the opposite case, you will have to determine which piece of information should be recorded in the lister state. As said earlier, we recommend declaring a dataclass for the lister state:
@dataclass class NewForgeListerState: current: str = "" class NewForgeLister(Lister[NewForgeListerState, NewForgePage]): ...
A pair of methods,
state_to_dict() are used to
respectively import lister state from the scheduler and export lister state to the
scheduler. Some fields may need help to be serialized to the scheduler, such as dates,
so this needs to be handled there.
Where is the state used? Taking the general case of a paginating service, the lister
state is used at the beginning of the
get_pages() method to initialize the
variables associated with the last listing progress. That way we can start from an
arbitrary element, or just the first one if there is no last lister state.
commit_page() is called on successful page processing, after the new
origins are sent to the scheduler. Here you should mainly update the lister state by
taking into account the new page processed, e.g. advance a date or serial field.
Finally, upon either completion or error, the
finalize() is called. There you
must set attribute
updated to True if you were successful in advancing in the
listing process. To do this you will commonly retrieve the latest saved lister state
from the scheduler and compare with your current lister state. If lister state was
updated, ultimately the current lister state will be recorded in the scheduler.
We have now seen the stateful lister API. Note that some listers may implement more flexibility in the use of lister state. Some allow an incremental parameter that governs whether or not we will do a stateful listing or not. It is up to you to support additional functionality if it seems relevant.
Handling specific topics#
Here is a quick coverage of common topics left out from lister construction and
When requesting a web service repeatedly, most parameters including headers do not
change and could be set up once initially. We recommend setting up a e.g. HTTP session,
as instance attribute so that further requesting code can focus on what really changes.
Some ubiquitous HTTP headers include “Accept” to set to the service response format and
“User-Agent” for which we provide a recommended value
USER_AGENT to be
swh.lister. Authentication is also commonly provided through
headers, so you can also set it up in the session.
Transport error handling#
We generally recommend logging every unhandleable error with the response content and
then immediately stop the listing by doing an equivalent of
Response.raise_for_status() from the
requests library. As for rate-limiting
errors, we have a strategy of using a flexible decorator to handle the retrying for us.
It is based on the
tenacity library and accessible as
This one is a moving target. You have to understand how the pagination mechanics of the particular service works. Some guidelines though. The identifier may be minimal (an id to pass as query parameter), compound (a set of such parameters) or complete (a whole URL). If the service provides the next URL, use it. The piece of information may be found either in the response body, or in a header. Once identified, you still have to implement the logic of requesting and extracting it in a loop and quitting the loop when there is no more data to fetch.
First, when retrieving page results, which involves some protocols and parsing logic, please make sure that any deviance from what was expected will result in an informational error. You also have to simplify the results, both with filtering request parameters if the service supports it, and by extracting from the response only the information needed into a structured page. This all makes for easier debugging.
There are also a few files that need to be modified outside of the lister directory, namely:
/setup.pyto add your lister to the end of the list in the setup section:
entry_points=""" [swh.cli.subcommands] lister=swh.lister.cli [swh.workers] lister.bitbucket=swh.lister.bitbucket:register lister.cgit=swh.lister.cgit:register ..."""
/swh/lister/tests/test_cli.pyto get a default set of parameters in scheduler-related tests.
/README.mdto reference the new lister.
/CONTRIBUTORSto add your name.
Testing your lister#
When developing a new lister, it’s important to test. For this, add the tests
swh/lister/*/tests/) and register the celery tasks in the main
Another important step is to actually run it within the docker-dev (Tutorial: run a lister within docker-dev in just a few steps).